RANA ZILADAR KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR SIALKOT
R14 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Acquisition of Illegal Use of Land Illegal Use Impact The Colony Scheme for the establishment of a Colony Scheme by the Government has been abolished and the possession of the disputed land remains with the claimant. Stay. ) The plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the declaration and return of the disputed land, which was filed by the trial court by the provincial government, which was accepted by the appellate court that the authorities had abolished the colony scheme and that the disputed property was not used. Was done and that the property should be returned at the cost at which it was acquired. There was considerable evidence on the record of the validity that the disputed property was not used for the establishment of the colony scheme and it is still vacant. On behalf of the administration, the plaintiff suffered a great loss. Due to the use of force by the authorities arbitrarily, the bread and butter were dropped by the appellate court. The source decided that there was no provision in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which gave the court the power to return the disputed land. If not used for this purpose, it was obtained Rule 14 of the Punjab Land Acquisition Rules 1983, which will come to the assistance of the plaintiff's High Court, which accepted the review petition and set aside the order of appeal. Gone \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
