Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMAR QURESHI versus MRS. ANJUM EHSAN

Sections 17 and 24 (2) relate to landlord and tenant, Estee Este Estoppel, attacking the tenant's defense due to non-payment of applicable tenant rent arrears. The court stated that it had deposited Rs 558,000 as rent arrears when the tenant was provided with the opportunity to pay the arrears of rent but failed to present such fact when the appeal. When placed in the position of Justices with the premise of the court, it attracted the principle of estoppel trial court. The tenant's defense was rightly struck

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector District Lahore v. MUHAMMAD LATIF 2010 CLC 1215
• Mst. UMATUL MOBEEN v. MUHAMMAD AZIZ 2010 YLR 1216
• Mirza QAYYUM BAIG v. DILSHAD AHMAD KHAN 2010 PTD 1216
• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1219
• Syed EJAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1223
• GHULAM JANNAT v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DERA GHAZI KHAN 2010 YLR 1227
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 YLR 1229
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 YLR 1231

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes