Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus D.P.O., GUJRANWALA


Article 420/468/471 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition to Use as Fraud, Fraudulent and Genuine Fake Document, Removal of FIR, to be raised by petitioner / accused lawyer in support of constitutional application Most skirmishes are based on facts. The High Court petitioner's constitutional jurisdiction did not join the inquiry to present the matter to the Investigation Officer, under which the applicant's lawyer was considered as the plaintiff's FIR. The suit could not be filed under. There was no power to prosecute the matter between the parties, as civil and criminal proceedings could go hand in hand, and only on the above scores, the FIR could not be barred alternatively, the constitutional application was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.