Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl i amd apprecia tion of benefit of evidence No evidence to show that there was no case, the prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence Extra judicial confession as evidence of very weak type Cannot immediately create a base from. For the accused's conviction, unless some independent evidence was affirmed, which was required in this case, the medical evidence and the circumstances of the case did not support the additional prosecution of the female accused, even medical evidence. This style of self-contradiction has also been found. There was no benefit to the incident, where other dastardly articles had already been recovered; there was no connection to the stabbing and stabbing of the knife, even as otherwise involved in the investigation of the independent witnesses. Without being a violation of Section 103, the CCP was not credible, the witness was a witness who did not have the opportunity to be a resident of the vicinity, but failed to explain his presence there at four in the morning. Despite being closely related to the driver, did not promptly inform the police or the police In addition, the same witness supported the complaining party's malpractice litigation against the female accused. Therefore, the evidence of her relatives Wajitkar was of no importance as the statement under section 2, Cr, CRPC, in relation to the same admissions filed by the lady accused, gave an explanation for doing so at a break stage. Without it, I could not be taken for granted. The prosecution, which on its turn, leaves the suspects without a doubt a domestic offense
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
