Section 302 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417 (2A) appeal against acquittal of three witnesses of prosecution, is closely related to the deceased, not to overpower the sole accused armed with only one dagger. Allowing him to injure fourteen, made his presence very suspicious at the scene of the killing, which also failed to explain his presence at the time of the incident, not to mention the time in the FIR. It appeared that he was not listed immediately and after consultation and deliberation, the incident did not prove to be a motive, which led to the account The failure of the suspect will also lose its significance, the recovery of the dagger from the suspect was highly suspicious; medical evidence can confirm the ocular evidence regarding the nature of the injury, rather than the injury. And the weapon used in the crime, but could not connect the accused to the commission of the crime, was doubled after the accused was acquitted. The notion of innocence, which could not be bothered unless justified, is based on no justification or misrepresentation or reading of evidence, which has not been identified in the present case. The appeal against the fate of the accused was dropped in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
