MRS. KISHWAR ASHRAF versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (MEMBER REVENUE), PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 10 and 30 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Controversial Question of Keeping the Constitutional Appeal The fact that the cancellation of a fraudulent transaction allotment petitioner claimed to be a good purchaser through exchange with those who questioned. The board claimed to have allotted revenue to the board. Under section 30 (2) of the Government Land Colonial Act (Punjab) Act 1912, notice was issued to the persons from whom the applicant had purchased the land and the allotment was canceled in his favor. Combined with the Board of Board's proprietary rights in their favor. Taxes were rightly issued notices under section 30 (2) of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, because the provision of the law gave the Board of Revenue the right to obtain fraud by concealing the facts. And terminate grants of rights based on misrepresentation. The dispute over land-to-land and land-based disputes was fraught with fraud and misrepresentation, as the Allies had no proprietary rights and were not treated fairly and honestly in their favor. The transfer of any place in the dispute by the fraudulent Allies cannot be sustained if the Foundation is weak. And it is likely to be demolished, then the structure built must be demolished by the High Court, the constitutional jurisdiction could not decide whether the matter was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, because There was a serious factual dispute in resolving the matter, after which a decision could be reached. Recordings of evidence from both parties
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
