Find a Lawyer

SYED NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus MUHAMMAD AMEER

A. XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and Section 115 Interim Order Prohibition, Appeal for Trial Court Appeal for Approval of Interim Order was dismissed and appeal filed against the trial court's decision was also dismissed. , The appellate court petitioner challenged all its conclusions. The two courts have declared the charge illegal and lawless and factual. Respondent's counsel submitted a certified copy of the judgment and order and stated that in the main case in which the applicant sought interim injunction, the order was dismissed, the applicant had no left. According to the respondents' statement and certified copy of the reason and decision of the proceeding and the suit of the said suit

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Mst. SAJIDA BIBI v. BABAR KHAN alias NASIR JAMAL AHMED KHAN 2010 MLD 904
• FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD., FAZALGARH, MUZAFFARGARH through Chief Executive v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2010 YLR 904
• NISAR AHMAD v. DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH 2010 CLC 905
• ABDUL SHAKOOR v. ABID HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 906
• Mst. SHAZIA MAI v. JUSTICE OF PEACE 2010 PCrLJ 910
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD JAMEEL v. S.H.O. , P.S. MUZAFFARGARH, MULTAN 2010 YLR 911
• MUHAMMAD SHAH v. HAIDER ALI SHAH 2010 MLD 911
• SHAUKAT ALI v. State 2010 YLR 914

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Chaman lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes