OI, R 10 & O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Controversy over land interim injunction, grant of application for its implementation as a party, the interim order passed by the appellate court against the interference Was filed against the order passed by the appellate court affirming. The applicant in his possession of the land by the plaintiff stated that as far as the existing structures and structures on the land are concerned, the defendant had no objection if he was retained in the same manner, but further construction on the premises. It has been banned, unless the case was determined by the State Council that the construction of the main building has been completed and only the boundary wall remains to be completed. The High Court has ruled that the boundary wall can be completed. , But no further construction will be done inside the premises until the decision is made. The applicant sought leave to become a party to the proceedings in which it was claimed that his interest was being affected. If the applicant has any legal right to the property on this subject, he / she will be required to submit a request. According to the law, its applicability can be obtained by the applicant cannot be included in the proceedings in which the claimant's claim was made against the applicant only and not against him. Claimed applicant rights
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
