In section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), denying the charge of section 376 rape, the accused was named in the FIR for rape of a complaining chemical auditor. The accused first took pictures of the complainant through a mobile phone camera and was then taken to a room and subjected to rape by the prosecution's witnesses, who fully supported the prosecution's story. (1), was entered into a CRPC prohibition clause. The charge was charged and the case was now settled for prosecution evidence, at which point it was not appropriate to discuss the merits or conduct of the case, which could make the case of any party prejudicial, the accused. There was enough content on the police file to attach to the commission. The defendant was denied bail in the crime case \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
