Find a Lawyer

SARDAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337A (i) (ii), 148 and 149 Guarantees, the grant of the effort for the convicted AMD was behind bars for almost 17 months and not even invoiced. was done. The speedy trial against him was the right of every accused in the trial so it was not the prosecution's fault to present Million for such a long period of time. The long suffering of the case can certainly be said / the case of the accused who made the allegation. The defendant was granted bail on charges of extracting a fresh ground for his bail, in the wake of the delay in his trial.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• HABIB AHMAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1185
• GHULAM FAREED v. State 2010 YLR 1188
• FATAH MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REV.)/SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, GUJRANWALA DIVISION 2010 CLC 1192
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. RAMZAN BIBI 2010 CLC 1196
• HARRIS STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive v. BANK OF PUNJAB 2010 CLD 1198
• ALLAH NAWAZ v. State 2010 YLR 1200
• ZAHEER AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 1204
• MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. State 2010 YLR 1207

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Shamsabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes