MUSARAT BANO versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 1 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVI, RR1, 2 and O. VII, R14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Demanding Respondent's Respondents for Deadly Accident Suit Compensation The petition filed under XVI, 1, 2, CPC seeking the police officer from the concerned police station as a witness, the CPC claimed that the accident record file could only be submitted by the police officer. Through the trial, the plaintiff filed a constitutional application. Subsequently, when the defendants filed a written statement, the list failed to state the names of the witnesses they knew that the defendants did not, at this point, rely on the police file in the list under A VII, R 14. On the record, and prove that they had sufficient reason not to rely on the police file and to exclude the names of police officers in the witness list, however, without telling anything, whether the defendants Provided for any good reason provided by, the application was allowed The technicians should not be allowed to defeat the end of justice In the interest of justice and justice, the parties should have been allowed to be on record. All the evidence available to confirm or defend your case upon request under O XVI, Rr 1, 2, has been retained by the following court-approved CPC.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
