MUHAMMAD ARIF versus DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER RAJANPUR
Article 199 Constitution Petition The applicant was given a contract by the government department to construct and construct drains, but after the completion of the work, he was not paid the outstanding amount of Rs. 177,600 before the receipt of the same amount. The constitutional application for the ground was dismissed. The constitutional jurisdiction cannot resolve the factual dispute that the law officer representing the department said that the applicant was contracted in 1999 but he granted 2000 valid I completed the work even if the applicant completed the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract can only be determined. Oh. By recording the evidence, the petitioner can prove his case and recover the dues through the civil suit, after completing the work in 2000, the applicant claimed the amount in 2009, therefore, his claim was barred by the contract. Influenced by the principle of, however, this cannot happen. Imposed by constitutional jurisdiction, therefore, the petitioner is dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
