MUHAMMAD INAYAT versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
Clauses 163 and 172 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner had inherited the suit land from his father and he was allowed to change the inheritance in his favor, but the executive district officer decided to file a review petition. Passed the previous party order against the petitioner. Respondents' review before the members, the Board of Revenue was also dismissed The applicants claimed that the deceased owner of the suit land had only three legal heirs - one applicant and two defendants, but the district officer , Revenue also declared the legal heir of another defendant illegal. The applicant further pleaded that the review request was banned and that despite the fact that the defendants failed to explain the long delay, the revenue authorities in their jurisdiction violated the applicants of the parties and Decided on the title of the shares, the respondents claimed that the exclusive power to generate revenue was handed over to the government. Twenty-four years after the respondents filed a petition for review of the properly performed under section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the amendment was made under section 163 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. It was the ninth day, yet a revision application was allowed that included a number of facts and title questions that were not within the scope of the revenue option that proceeded without deciding the boundary and jurisdictional questions. First West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Decision Provided For Special Jurisdiction Of Civil Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
