The witnesses who supported the material aspects of the case appreciated each other's testimony as to the reasons for the inconvenience of Section 302 (b) / 34, 337a (i) / 34 and 337a (ii) / 34. Everyone knows. Secondly, no question of false identity could arise, resulting in confidence from being affected by ocular testimony, which was supported by medical evidence on the occasion of the accused and positive report of the accused's sero-logist under 302 (b) PPC. Hecht was recovered. Therefore, the murder of the victim was retained, however, the prosecution failed to prove that the accused had given only one blow to the deceased, what really happened at the scene before the incident, was not known. Was not planned. The trial was a sudden fight and the injured witness did not blame the accused for any injury to his person, therefore, the charges were dropped under Sec. tions 337 A (i) (ii) / 34 PPC appeal was dealt with in English style
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
