Article 5 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition affecting non-display of list of dowry articles Plaintiff sued for recovery of articles of dowry or its value trial under Rs. 1,301,092. The defendant in the court made the claim in this case. There was no documentary evidence on record, the trial appellate court's order was heard in the trial, it was allowed on the occasion of the appeal and the amount was reduced from Rs 1,301,902 to 834 Rs. 713, the defendant believed that the list of articles of dowry was never shown in the record. That the defendant, while appearing as a witness, confessed that the list was prepared at the time of filing suit, the accuracy of which was not disclosed in view of the fact that the plaintiff redacted the list. ? This list was not specifically examined. Such a case was also proved in the evidence of the plaintiff's father, who specifically stated that the list was actually noted in his diary at the time of marriage. A new list was prepared for the purpose of filing a case in court on the basis that the plaintiff stated in his statement that the groom's mother had handled the dowry articles as well as the dowry articles listed in the accompanying list. There was no question of the recovery of the subordinate courts, they were fair, fair and cautious and The jurisdiction was exercised under the parameters set by the High Court which refused to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction. Excluded \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
