Articles 265 K & 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 302 and 392 Qatl e amd and the definition of tension evidence of the robbery proceedings, the bail, the identification of the accused and three other accomplices during the identification of a prosecution witness, The complainant filed an application under Section 5 345, CRPC, which made no progress because the offense was not justified, the accused filed a petition under Section 265, CRPC, which accused him of trial. The accused had filed an application under section 555A, CRPC. The High Court dealt with the directive to complete the trial within eight weeks, however, the trial failed to proceed quickly, the defendant filed another plea for dismissal, which was dismissed by eyewitnesses. The evidence clearly stated that they could not identify the accused and the accused in the case were not personalities who had killed the accused, the remaining two witnesses have migrated to the United States for the good fortune of the case. The testimony of the two witnesses was indicated which needed to be examined by the prosecution even though the witnesses had left the country. However, their presence was not impossible, so the trial court did not. Prisons in prison, guilty of dismissing a defendant's plea for guilty verdict, however, cannot be dismissed on the one hand because he was not responsible for the delay in the trial but has yet to file legal evidence. The arraignments are pending, so nothing is certain about the end of the trial that could have led to the accused being allowed to rot in jail indefinitely, so
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
