MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus MST. SIANI BIBI ALIAS SHAMMA
Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application for Recovery of Suits Rehabilitation Allowance. The trial court upheld the restitution allowance and recovery of Rs. 1,00,000 under Column No. 18 of the marriage agreement for the eviction of the house, the return of the articles of marriage and the restoration of marital rights. But the case for the return of the dowry articles was dismissed, the order restoring the marital rights was also subject to payment of the restitution allowance in favor of the husband, and the order passed by the trial court was upheld by the appellate court. None of the 18 spouses had explicitly provided that if a husband removed the wife from his house without cause, he would have to pay Rs.100,000 as the agreement shows. This money can be paid in the event of an agreed event provided the job is terminated. It was for no reason; it was in such a case that the payment of deferred damages was not paid by the Family Court for the payment of the required evidence and the payment of the fine, which was not mentioned in Column No. 19 by the spouse's wife was personal. Was the goods delivered to West Pakistan. The Family Courts Act, 1964, shall include the right to own, use and enjoy the said property, such as jewelry, jewelry, gifts and strings; the property in the contract was not owned by the plaintiff's wife, The only right to recover is to be firm in the event of the fact that the husband will throw the wife out of his house. In the present case, a decree for the right mentioned in column number 19 of the nomination was a civil right and it was processed by a civil court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
