CH. GUL MUHAMMAD versus ASHRAF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.
Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), AXXIX, R1, O XLI, Rr 3 and 11 Appeal filed by the corporation / company Restoration Wendy was a private limited company that made trial decisions and The order passed in favor of the former umpire. Appealed under OXLI, Rr 3 and 11, the appeal was dismissed by the CPC for failure to file a hearing. The lower appellate court dismissed the appeal for a decision on the question to be retained at the final hearing. Legal action on behalf of a corporation or company may not be filed by any person other than the authority of the board of directors of the company, if the board of directors is authorized by the authority of the company The director in charge or the secretary has been given the option. Such action was approved at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of Wendy's Company, which failed to prevent any form of appeal that confirmed the appeal's signature. He was authorized to establish and prosecute them, nor was it told before the court that the resolution was approved and that he was available in the company's minutes book and could keep the same on record. The appellate court erroneously dismissed the application filed by the pre-emptor on this basis. The matter will be decided at the hearing of the appeal on the merit. Prior to entering the appeal, the umpire filed an application for confession and retention before entering the appeal, and before the lower appellate court entered the High Court of Appeal,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
