Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), possessing Arts 3/4 intoxicants bail, Plaintiff was a 70-year-old man near whom the person was always considered a weak. There was also no mention of human weakness in Article 497, CRPC accused could not be held behind bars for punishment as he had been behind bars for several months. The suspect that allegedly exported `Shang in 'was also included in the types of prohibited narcotic substances, but his maximum sentence was 4 kilograms of cannabis recovery, which prohibited section 497. I was not given, Cr challan was presented before the trial court and the accused was no more punishment. Keeping the suspects behind bars for further investigation will not prove to be a worthwhile purpose, considering the old age of the accused, the maximum punishment for the offense being years - RI which does not fall in the section 497 , CCP's IBRA Clause, the accused accepted on bail \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
