Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE

Section 381 A Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 550 (1973) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Vehicle Theft Petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, whereby he applied for the applicant's car Appeal for superannuation was rejected. Police seized on suspicion of theft by police Three different reports of forensic science laboratories proved that the stolen vehicle was not stolen property, neither the applicant's name nor the applicant's property in the registration book Can provide proof of transfer document in favor of the vehicle unlawful order did not suffer any illegal interference which is guaranteed by the High Court intervention Constitutional application was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• INAYAT BIBI v. AMJAD ALI 2010 YLR 2936
• ABDUL RASHID v. MUNSHI KHAN 2010 YLR 2941
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID alias SHAHDI v. State 2010 YLR 2950
• HUMAYUN AKHTAR KHAN v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2959
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2010 YLR 2973
• Ch. GUL MUHAMMAD v. ASHRAF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2010 YLR 2974
• SHAHID KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2982
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR 2010 YLR 2987

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Ghari Dupatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes