Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID ALIAS SHAHDI versus STATE

The testimony of the accused in connection with the robbery of Section 6 murder6 was not appreciated in the FIR. Not examined and described. And their comparison, if any, is not enough to identify the suspect with their hands on their head, but also to reveal what part of the events each of them played. And how the prosecution's witnesses were interested in the incident and the witnesses of the occasion, who did not specify their presence at the scene of the crime, and their evidence was highly suspicious, the accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• WAJID ALI v. State 2010 YLR 2933
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD RANA v. Ch. M. SHAFIQUE 2010 YLR 2935
• INAYAT BIBI v. AMJAD ALI 2010 YLR 2936
• ABDUL RASHID v. MUNSHI KHAN 2010 YLR 2941
• HUMAYUN AKHTAR KHAN v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2959
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2967
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2010 YLR 2973
• Ch. GUL MUHAMMAD v. ASHRAF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2010 YLR 2974

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

list of supreme court advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes