Section 2302 (b) / Q 34 Defamation Trial Prosecution Case Was Fully Established on Any Evidence The deceased's father complainant did not designate anyone as an accused in the FIR, but the request thereafter The name of the accused I had named was evidence of the motivation of the two witnesses and was inadmissible, which was otherwise not credible The last seen witness was not a resident of the place where he saw the victim with the accused. And he couldn't explain it to us. At the relevant time, the four accused allegedly made extra judicial confession after leaving with the witness, who was closely related to the deceased and was sitting at the complainant's house and had no status in the society. ? Ask them to commit confession before him so that the recovery of some stones by the Investigation Officer cannot be relied upon for the statement of the witness for ten days. After the incident had no benefit, there were no blood stains and normal stones. Due to the fact that were readily available in the area, the investigating officer did not inspect the site and recovered the stones during the preparation of the site. The prosecution case was not beyond doubt, and the accused were acquitted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
