Find a Lawyer

SYED MURAD ALI SHAH versus HAFEEZULLAH

Due to the superior entitlement of section 13 & 13 13, the case was filed on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to fulfill the required houses under the law, the trial court and the appellate court had claimed the plaintiff. Was deleted. Their witnesses stated that on 25-6 1998, the plaintiff found out about the sale of the disputed land but was subsequently manipulated with this data on 26 April 1998, arguing the plaintiff's accuracy. Was manipulated in the date of 26 6 1998 but neither question was presented to the plaintiff's witness during its interim inquiry nor was such an objection raised before the trial court and thus The objection was not entertaining at the review stage. The plaintiff failed to identify any illegal or irregularities in the case. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Malik MUHAMMAD MURAD v. Malik MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2010 YLR 3027
• AMJAD IQBAL v. State 2010 YLR 3031
• TAHAIR SIDDIQUE v. State 2010 YLR 3034
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. Malik MUHAMMAD JAVED 2010 YLR 3036
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2010 YLR 3044
• ZAHEER AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 3050
• Sh. MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. Sh. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 2010 YLR 3062
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2010 YLR 3064

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

property advocates from Kallat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes