Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) praise the evidence of Qatil Ahmed, the reduction of the statement made by the investigating officer before his death at the time of the conviction also supported the witnesses statement of the deceased taken by the accused. Was There was no evidence presented on their defense record that the parties did not come to the court with open hands and they tried to suppress their role and to highlight the role of the court on the other side, however, Can draw the argument. The evidence and circumstances of the case were suddenly contested; there was no long enmity between the parties; the incident was not presented. In this case the wife of the accused was also injured, the accused's sentence changed from section 2302 (b). Was reduced to Section 302 (c), PPC and their imprisonment up to ten years RI.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ZAHEER AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 3050
• Sh. MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. Sh. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 2010 YLR 3062
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2010 YLR 3064
• MUHAMMAD RAMEEZ v. State 2010 YLR 3068
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. CHAIRMAN/CIVIL MEMBER BAC 2010 YLR 3079
• HASSAN AUTOMATION through Chief Executive v. WORLD DATACOM (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive 2010 YLR 3080
• State v. ABDUL MAJEED 2010 YLR 3087
• SHAHZAD alias SHADDA v. State 2010 YLR 3093

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes