There was no direct evidence of the murder of the deceased by Section 497 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatil Im Bell, Grant. Seven days after the arrest of the accused exporting the empty cairn to the accused, he was sent to the forensic science laboratory, there was no identifiable value when the accused was not designated by the complainant in his supplementary statement when witnesses arrived at the confession. The victim was injured in the incident. No specific role has been designated for the accused. In the case of the accused, further investigation is required and he cannot be denied the right to bail only on the basis that the offense was committed under section 497. 1) falls under the prohibited clause. ) Although the CCP had begun the trial and two prosecution witnesses have been investigated, it was not possible to conclude the case sooner, the co-accused had already been released. The bail was also entitled to the same relief by the High Court accused of consistency rule.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
