Section 42 Sue for Declaration Plaintiff sued for declaring that he had seized the disputed property and for altering alleged gifts in favor of one of his sons when Lane During the religion, debt was collected to buy a tractor. The plaintiff had died and the rest of the legal heirs were made a party to the matter because the defendants in this case had contested on behalf of the parties as stated by the plaintiff about collecting debt for the tractor. The story was not proven on record, the trial court dismissed the case of the appellate court. Appeal, its permission and the trial court's decision and order set aside. One of the defendants, who appeared as a witness, admitted that she was maintaining a good relationship with the fine because her daughter was living with her as an adoptive daughter. An interested witness also testified that he had signed the gift change without reading the plaintiff's identifier, Dee acknowledged that the plaintiff's death had occurred in a house where all the brothers were jointly While the trial court had misunderstood the evidence and failed to appreciate the genuine dispute between the parties, the petition was dismissed by the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
