The first appeal for relief of delays in Sections 66 and the XL, R1 Demarcation Act (IX of 8 1908 of late), sections 5 and 12, was raised by the Office of the Objection that the appeal had a day restriction. There was nothing in the petitioner's petition for defamation, to show that the copy of the appellant was informed by the copy agency about the completion of an invalid judgment and certified copy of the decree in which The copy of the trial court is incurred by the appellant in obtaining a copy, which would have been sufficient in the sense of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Even the original receipt of the transcript and the same was submitted in the High Court of Appeal and the affidavit stated that it prevents him from filing the appeal within time and not denied by the affidavit. Otherwise the first appeal simply should not be excluded. On the basis of the limitation, the appellate court should have decided on the merits, otherwise the appeal is filed through the appeal without a formal hearing before the decision and the petition for a late condolence petition by the High Court. Was filed for
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
