A VII, R 2, O IX, R 13, O XVII, R 3, O XLI, R 1 and Section 115 suit for the recovery of the preceding injunction, keeping the witnesses involved in the proof of their claim to the plaintiff, But the defendant failed to produce evidence, his defense was dismissed and the trial was dismissed, neither the trial court's order was challenged nor the defendant's copy of the injunction The appeal was attached to the memo, only the copy of the unwanted decision approved by the Court of Appeal was attached to the trial court's request without a copy of the order, nor the copy to the trial court The approved orders were not attached to the request for review, nor were copies of the trial court-approved order under the O XLI, R1, CPC clause, which was the order against which the appeal And was being attacked. It was necessary to provide a certified copy of the order with a memorandum of appeal, though it was the order that was being challenged in the appeal, not the order or decision, but such irregularity was not fatal as a result of the dismissal of the appeal. Because it won't have any effect. The appeal of the court's jurisdiction memorandum must be accompanied by a copy of this decree and if it was not attached, it was not properly presented because the court would have been required to provide sufficient justice to it. High, the parties leaving aside the decision to request a revision of its merits said without any inquiry
