Find a Lawyer

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, N.AS. GILGIT versus MST. KHALIDA KHANUM

Section 42 General Clause Act (X of 1897), the Section 21 suit for declaration notification issued by the competent authority, was initially appointed by the plaintiffs on the basis of the contract and subsequently the plaintiffs through the notification BP Was regularized in S9. After some time, the authorities changed the pay scale of the plaintiffs to Grade 9 and placed them in BPS7 and the trial court also excluded the amount paid to the plaintiffs' suit for the declaration filed by the plaintiffs. But they succeeded in obtaining the victims before the appellate court, which dismissed the decision on the trial and the trial court's order, or when a notification issued or issued by a competent authority. Cannot be withdrawn or returned when it has legal effect. And under Section 21 of the General Clause Act 1897, certain rights were made in favor of any person and the order of the trial court was upheld.

Related judgments — Northern, 2010

• MUHAMMAD HABIL v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, N.As., Giilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 753
• MUHAMMAD MUSA v. JAN MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 807
• YAWAR HUSSAIN v. ANSAR ALI KHAN 2010 CLC 46
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Secretary, Education N.As. v. FIDA HUSSAIN 2010 CLC 91
• AGHA KHAN EDUCATION SERVICE, PAKISTAN v. SULTAN ALI 2010 PLC(CS) 127
• NIAMAT KHAN v. SECRETARY, KASHMIR AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN AREA, ISLAMABAD 2010 CLC 129
• UP-GRADATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS/STAFF AND ALLOWANCE ETC. 2010 PLC(CS) 141
• MIRZA HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 CLC 151

All Northern judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes