Find a Lawyer

MST. SADIQA BANO versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, N.AS., GILGIT

In response to an advertisement in section 19, the applicant for the Civil Service Appointment appeared in the Written Examination and not only passed the Written Examination and Interview, but was also at the top of the list of successful candidates. He is entitled to appoint a teacher in his respective Union Council, but authorities have refused to submit to the applicant the pretext of being a judge before a court in relation to certain positions against the office bearers, but present Not against the position Applicable authorities during this period appointed someone else against a vacant post without prejudice to judicial cases, which demonstrated discrimination against the applicant in which Applicant officially entitled to teacher appointment, official directed to appoint The applicant was against the said post and he was also entitled to receive all the benefits of services including salary.

Related judgments — Northern, 2010

• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 CLC 186
• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 PLC(CS) 200
• ARSHAD MEHMOOD CH. v. KARAKURUM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY through Acting Registrar 2010 PLC(CS) 245
• HANIFULLAH v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, NA\'sGilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 331
• MUHAMMAD HABIL v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, N.As., Giilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 753
• MUHAMMAD MUSA v. JAN MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 807
• YAWAR HUSSAIN v. ANSAR ALI KHAN 2010 CLC 46
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Secretary, Education N.As. v. FIDA HUSSAIN 2010 CLC 91

All Northern judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Pirpai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes