PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY N.A. GILGIT versus KEHKASHAN BEGUM
Section 10 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXX, RR1 and 2 of the Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) The reluctant, Grant Civil Employment Plaintiff was transferred to the post of Lady Teacher on the DD Teacher and succeeded in deploying herself to the place `G Post ', but was later instructed by the authorities to report at her place. The plaintiff attacked the authorities' direction in a public trial, but along with the trial, the Lower Appellate Court filed the case and appeal filed by its Chief Court. Excluded, which, under the exercise of the jurisdiction of the review, passed the interim injunction against the transfer order keeping the orders under the two courts aside, a valid judgment passed by the Chief Justice of any law Not supported and not supported by any law, without the support of any law, privileges were extended only on a humanitarian basis; the interest of the common people cannot be given priority over the interests of the common people. For example, especially women students whose interest was assigned to the civil court could not interfere with the posting / transfer case, as the Chief Justice could routinely intervene in such matters when the authorities The proceedings are not based on the beads nor do they prove that the Supreme Appellate Court set aside the order passed by the Chief Court and restored the trial court and those of the lower appellate court who appealed. Permission was r \ n
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
