Find a Lawyer

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY NORTHERN AREAS, GILGIT versus KHALIDA KHANUM

The application for leave to appeal for a civil service suit filed by Section 19 employees was dismissed as time-barred, but they were successful in appeal because the appellate court upheld the appellate court's decision and order. The claimant's order was rejected. Applicants had filed leave for appeal by the Chief Court. The lawyer did not indicate on the record that there was a preliminary appointment of employees at BPS7 or that the appointment to a subsequent upgrade / BPS9 was on a permanent basis. Employees' upgrade / appointment orders at BPS 9 by the authorized authority were illegal or not in compliance. And after taking effect, a valuable right was created in his favor; such a dismissal would be beyond the scope of the authority of the competent authority; the authorities identified any material wrongs or jurisdiction in the judgment of the Chief Justice Are not able to. The leave application for appeal was dismissed, demanding the intervention of the Supreme Court

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• KHUSH MALIK v. State 2010 GBLR 83
• GUL NAYAB SHAH v. NAMKEEN SHAH 2010 GBLR 84
• ALI SARWAR v. Mst. MARYUM 2010 GBLR 86
• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 GBLR 88
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary N.A. Gilgit v. KEHKASHAN BEGUM 2010 GBLR 95
• RESIDENTS OF CHAPORTE BALA through Representatives v. RESIDENTS OF CHAPROTE PAIN through Representatives 2010 GBLR 98
• KARAKORAM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor v. NUMAN BUTT 2010 GBLR 100
• GHULAMUDDIN v. RAHIM ULLAH 2010 GBLR 104

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

patent advocate from Mastoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes