Find a Lawyer

GHULAMUDDIN versus RAHIM ULLAH

Article 42 and Gil Bal Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 1, Article (1 (? 60) Proof of Final Facts by the Courts Under the Supreme Appellate Court, Evidence by the Trial Court The decision in this case was dismissed after the recording of the case. Requires re-examination of evidence in order to arrive at conclusions. This is not considered a good case for reassessment. No error determination was made on the question of law and the defendants were not referred for interference with the decisions and the appeal was allowed by the courts below.

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Northern Areas, Gilgit v. KHALIDA KHANUM 2010 GBLR 92
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary N.A. Gilgit v. KEHKASHAN BEGUM 2010 GBLR 95
• RESIDENTS OF CHAPORTE BALA through Representatives v. RESIDENTS OF CHAPROTE PAIN through Representatives 2010 GBLR 98
• KARAKORAM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor v. NUMAN BUTT 2010 GBLR 100
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Northern Areas Gilgit v. MUBEEN KHAN 2010 GBLR 106
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Chief Secretary N.As. Gilgit 2010 GBLR 107
• NAJAF SHAH through Akbar Ali Shah v. AHALIAN MOUZA KHALTARO 2010 GBLR 112
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. HASSAN 2010 GBLR 114

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Padidan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes