Find a Lawyer

KARAKORAM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR versus NUMAN BUTT

Article 60 (13) was, in fact, a candidate for leave to apply for leave to raise answers to controversial questions and was frustrated by the selection of the University Chief Justice as a result of the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction over final selection. ? He directed the administration to appoint a defendant against the office of the Moderate Chief Court in light of the matter before addressing the question of the facts in detail and considering the merits of the respondents in the written examination. The University / employer fails to render a decision in favor of it cannot be interfered with by the Chief Court not reading any misrepresentation or evidence or finding any error of law in fact in the judgment whether it was false or invalid. The legality of the decision on the basis of use cannot be challenged before the High Court. On the basis of facts which were not available on record in front of the lower court and in light of this, the SU Appellate Court entertained and entertained new facts and did not appeal to the Supreme Court any appeal to the Supreme Court. Or the facts were not found to be in error and the appeal was denied.

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 GBLR 88
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Northern Areas, Gilgit v. KHALIDA KHANUM 2010 GBLR 92
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary N.A. Gilgit v. KEHKASHAN BEGUM 2010 GBLR 95
• RESIDENTS OF CHAPORTE BALA through Representatives v. RESIDENTS OF CHAPROTE PAIN through Representatives 2010 GBLR 98
• GHULAMUDDIN v. RAHIM ULLAH 2010 GBLR 104
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Northern Areas Gilgit v. MUBEEN KHAN 2010 GBLR 106
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Chief Secretary N.As. Gilgit 2010 GBLR 107
• NAJAF SHAH through Akbar Ali Shah v. AHALIAN MOUZA KHALTARO 2010 GBLR 112

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

best law firms from Besham lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes