Scope Petitioner reviewing the decision of the AXXVI Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 65 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 114 and O XLVII, R1, of the Supreme Appellate Court Revised the decision. The appeal was allowed and the trial was heard in the trial court. The scope of the review was very limited and the parties could not be allowed to seek the provisions as in the case of minor review one may be requested in exceptional circumstances where an order / order for which appeal was not allowed. And second, that the applicant was unable to identify new and important facts / law or evidence on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which was not in the knowledge of the party after careful practice, on which the request for review was made. May be considered for admission. The evidence and all matters related to the case were fully debated by Phil Bench of the Supreme Appeal Court. No mistake or mistake was made by the Appellate Court of the Supreme Court as a matter of appeal to the Court on its own judgment, only on that basis. However, the petitioner was upset with the decision, the Supreme Appeal Court refused to review its decision, dismissing the request for review.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
