Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 attempt to impose sanctions after murder, grant of further investigation, report of deadly shotgun firearms expert, absence of accused's name The accused in the IR was allegedly identified by the complainant as having recovered the weapon of the crime, which shows that the educational evaluation of the material available on the record shows that there is no direct evidence linking the accused to the crime. does not exist. It was yet to be ascertained who was shot and the firearms specialist with the prosecution has no information to ascertain whether the pistol was recovered from the accused. Such facts brought the matter to the accused. Further investigation domain within the meaning of section 497 (2), CR PC Bell was allowed \ r \ n
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
