OFFICER COMMANDING 182 PETROLEUM STORAGE PLATOON ARMY SERVICE JUGLOT, GILGIT versus ALI MUHAMMAD
Section 42 & Gil 54 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, 60, Article 1360 (?)) Suit for Advertising and Permanent Order Withholding Authorities issue a letter to the plaintiff to recover the money because the land revenue The plaintiffs' remorse seemed to resonate with the letter above, the plaintiff sued. The amount was not recoverable in the dispute because according to the land revenue arrears, the provincial government did not announce through notification that the court hearing the pending cases of land revenue, turned its attention to the fundamental and fundamental issue of jurisdiction. Fixed some issues without interrupting. The appellate court upheld the trial court's ruling and order to recover the liability as a ground review and dismiss the case. The Chief Court accepted the review of the courts and the concurrent results of the following courts In which both the lower courts, including the Chief Justice, failed. Turn your attention to the formation of the important and necessary issue of jurisdiction In the search of the courts by the authorities, not all courts had any legal sanctity which failed to compile the important and necessary matters of jurisdiction. The court-approved verdict and order were set aside and the case was returned to the trial court with the direction of the verdict. The question of jurisdiction in the matter after the decision of the matter matters
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
