Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN BALGHARI versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT

Article 60 (13) Appeal for leave of appeal for jurisdiction There was no legal jurisdictional error or legal error in the order of the Chief Court or the order of the department regarding the withdrawal of tenders was not to interfere with the matter. In which there was nothing material illegal. Action taken in good faith under the auspices of the Chief Court or in the public interest of the Administration

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• MEHBOOB ALAM LONE v. CHIEF JUDGE GILGIT-BALTISTAN CHIEF COURT, GILGIT 2010 GBLR 332
• MUHAMMAD GHAFAR v. ZAMINDARAN BIRGAL 2010 GBLR 333
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. KHALID MEHMOOD 2010 GBLR 335
• OFFICER COMMANDING 182 PETROLEUM STORAGE PLATOON ARMY SERVICE JUGLOT, GILGIT v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2010 GBLR 336
• Lt.-Col. ARSHAD MEHMOOD CH. v. KIU 2010 GBLR 341
• Haji GHULAM MEHDI v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 GBLR 343
• JUMMA SYED v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 GBLR 345
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. SADAR AZAM 2010 GBLR 347

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Dhatmal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes