Find a Lawyer

LT.-COL. ARSHAD MEHMOOD CH. versus KIU

Article Gil 65 Gilgit-Baltistan Supreme Appeal Court Rules, 1, A Review of the XXVII Supreme Appeal Court's Audit General Correcting the Inaccuracy of Claiming Amount of Claims in the Account's Prior Statements On the basis of the last salary, the report was made on C and D and the statement of the account was considered part of the record. Will ensure that the applicant's claim is paid within one month.

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• MUHAMMAD GHAFAR v. ZAMINDARAN BIRGAL 2010 GBLR 333
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. KHALID MEHMOOD 2010 GBLR 335
• OFFICER COMMANDING 182 PETROLEUM STORAGE PLATOON ARMY SERVICE JUGLOT, GILGIT v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2010 GBLR 336
• MUHAMMAD AMIN BALGHARI v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 2010 GBLR 340
• Haji GHULAM MEHDI v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 GBLR 343
• JUMMA SYED v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 GBLR 345
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. SADAR AZAM 2010 GBLR 347
• Haji GHULAM HUSAN v. Haji QASIM 2010 GBLR 351

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

tax advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes