JUMMA SYED versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GILGIT-BALTISTAN
Violations of property rights reports submitted by the Local Commissioner for Arts 16 and 60 (13) would indicate that the road was being constructed without a feasibility or survey report or layout plan department, the site plan On the basis of this the construction work was started and the road was diverted. The applicant's prima facie land was violated by the applicant's property rights for which the compensation could not be sufficiently appellate court, without commenting on the merits of the case, as the trial court directed the road layout. After deciding the specific issue on the plan, the central case will be decided within three months to avoid delays in the construction of the road and in the meantime the status of the party will be maintained, however, unnecessary legal construction of the public road. To avoid gambling, parties can resolve issues smoothly. The leave of appeal was converted to appeal and dealt with accordingly
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
