Find a Lawyer

CLIC versus PAK. CHINA C&MC. (PVT.) LTD.

Article 60 (13) was not complied with by the Chief Bank for the presentation of the bank guarantee, and consequently the trial judge kept a copy of the order, retaining 10% of the bond deposited by the applicant. The lawyer for the defendant was attached to the council. It was submitted in the record that the petitioner's counsel could be dismissed by the petitioner's submission of the order passed by the trial court, suggesting that he would not put further pressure on the plea, but would periodically take advantage of the remedy. Will Suppressed

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• HASSAN SHAH v. SHAHZADA KHAN 2010 GBLR 326
• TAJAN v. ABDUL MAJEED 2010 GBLR 328
• Syed SAROOSH HAIDER RIZVI v. NAB 2010 GBLR 329
• MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR REHMAN 2010 GBLR 330
• MEHBOOB ALAM LONE v. CHIEF JUDGE GILGIT-BALTISTAN CHIEF COURT, GILGIT 2010 GBLR 332
• MUHAMMAD GHAFAR v. ZAMINDARAN BIRGAL 2010 GBLR 333
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. KHALID MEHMOOD 2010 GBLR 335
• OFFICER COMMANDING 182 PETROLEUM STORAGE PLATOON ARMY SERVICE JUGLOT, GILGIT v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2010 GBLR 336

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates contact from Shahdad Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes