O VI, R 2 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) After hearing the mini suit for recovery of money filed by the plaintiff, the Chief Justice imposed sanctions by the trial court. The plaintiff against the judgment of the Chief Justice after hearing the trial and remand of the trial court to decide the appropriate case after receiving the trial court's remand and reviewing the petitions. A leave application for appeal was filed, which led to the Chief Court's decision on the merits of the appeal and the question of limitations properly Considering that the trial was not considered justified in the trial court, the Chief Justice did not properly attend to the controversial question of the fact of law arising from the appeals of the parties. Finding some things meaningless, without creating any extra issues or defining the default ones, without setting up the proper ones. In view of the nature of the dispute between the parties and the role of the case, the court remanded, rather than resolving the factual dispute, that the trial court could, if necessary, refrain from the matter or arrange additional matters. , Or if presented by a lawyer. For the parties, the parties may also allow further evidence to be added. If needed, the Supreme Appeal Court directed that the presence is an old case, so proceeding quickly and without unnecessary adjournment to either party. Will decide and decide the action before the winter holidays. Sleep on the question of law and facts
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
