Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Murder of Um Bell, the state cancellation petition filed for cancellation of the accused's bail in connection with the murder of her husband Respondent / accused Allowed the bail with the observation that there was no direct evidence. In order to ascertain the question of guilt or innocence at trial, the circumstantial evidence has not yet been examined, Advocate General submitted in his statement under Section 161 to the son of the sixth grade student accused. What was, the CRPC, clearly stated that his mother had an illicit relationship, that the commission had disappeared because of a crime with his partner, with no direct evidence available and indirect evidence Direct evidence could not be substituted, though the son's suspicion of his illicit relationship with his co-accused was Doing this will not be enough to stop the bail. There can be no interference with the order of the Chief Justice's bail
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
