Section 24 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) The trial ground for the transfer of the case was heard by the petitioner under which the petitioner transferred the civil suit from one court to another. The petition filed by the Chief Justice was dismissed. The grounds for the transfer of cases were that the respondent in the case abused him in open court, using dirty language, but the civil judge did not notice the defendant's conduct in the court. Taken. The attitude of the silent spectator of the Presiding Officer not only encouraged the defendant but also defamed the court. The applicant had lost confidence in the trial judge's liberty in the cases and after the transfer petition was dismissed, the trial judge, by the Chief Court, had prepared a prejudice against the applicant and in his absence he was unable to be arrested. Bail warrants were issued. The Presiding Officer's actions seriously reflected his freedom and fairness, it was true that the trial court's transfer of a reasonable hold in the minds of the presiding officer's unfair treatment or prejudice. In this case it was considered a suitable ground, but the concerns alone were not sufficient to doubt the independence of the presiding officer of a party of the court. Such party could be held responsible for the prosecution in accordance with the law. Yes, but it can't be. Good and legitimate basis for transferring a case from one court to another This was not a common practice in civil proceedings gs
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
