Find a Lawyer

SUO MOTU CASE NO.9 OF 2010 versus

Additional Deputy Commissioner, Superintendent Engineer in Skardu and provision of basic facilities in XEN Article 61 of the Supreme Appeal Court's autonomous jurisdiction states that the position of the projects under consideration is satisfactory and vigilant for the continued implementation of the Commissioner's plans. Is. The appellate court settled the matter accordingly

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• SUO MOTU CASE NO.12 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 390
• State v. KHAN BIBI alias KHANI 2010 GBLR 412
• ABDUL GHANI v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GILGIT-BALTISTAN 2010 GBLR 413
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.8 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 414
• QAMAR ABBAS v. VICE CHANCELLOR KIU 2010 GBLR 417
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.1 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 418
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.5 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 419
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 6 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 420

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes