Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Appeal The claim for the applicant's softening of the upper age limit of softly educated divorced women in the civil service age was that if the married married women were to be divorced later and then As long as they cross the upper age limit, go get a job in government semi-government and independent bodies because the upper age limit was not relaxed for the rules regarding age relaxation, it showed. That upper age relaxation was provided for different classes of individuals, however, no rules / regulations does not exist. To the extent that the relaxation of the upper age limit for privileged educated women, who were desperately in need of earning bread for themselves and their children after divorce, such a waiver would equate to discrimination, upper age. Not providing relaxation rules to such professionals and highly skilled women was clearly subject to the prohibition of Article 25 of the Constitution The High Court observed that the rules in this regard were reasonable and appropriate. As such, immediate steps need to be taken to amend and the experts in this article will work together to ease such divorces into the age. Formulate rules for those who were highly skilled, professional and well-educated constitutional petitioners were admitted and allowed, and federal / provincial and all independent bodies, etc., relaxed such divorced women into upper age limits. There was a directive to set up a giving decree, for those who wish to join or re-serve the aforementioned bodies.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
