The suit for possession of the plaintiffs in Section 9 suit was that they were the owners of the suit property that was given to a person as a tenant. That after the death of this person / tenant, it was being cultivated by another person as the tenant stated that in 2001 the other person transferred possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs and thereafter cultivated it. Was made and subsequently the tenancy had to be relinquished. Under a black-and-white agreement, the defendants alleged that the defendants, who were frustrated, forcibly seized the suit property The defendants claimed that they were the tenants on the suit property and the defendants never cultivated the land. The defendants had accused them of abandoning the work. Was fake and a plaintiff. The evidence, on the record, proved that the suit property was their sole property, with the defendants specifically pleading that their tenant renounce possession of the suit property in their favor in 2001, which was proved by the witnesses. Even if it is considered that the defendant's tenant was included, the defendant, as the tenant, in the suit area, the tenant was not eligible to do so, under the circumstances, the defendant had the right to be found guilty. Once, once the defendants were arrested and declared guilty, the civil court obtained the power to pass judgment on them. Under this, the judgments and decrees of the courts are well understood and face any irregular or illegal proceedings, so there is naturally little scope for review by the High Court. \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
