Articles 8 and 42 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), A XXI, R 58, O XXII, R 4 and Section 47 suit, execution of the injunction and death of the defendant, the lawsuit filed by the defendants Ultimately, a decision has been made in their favor. , They filed the execution, initially deciding who was the legal heir of the accused who died during the trial and who had fought the case in the appellate court, raising objections to the order's execution. The objection petition was filed and said that the object request was eventually dismissed. The Applicant Court, after which the petitioners, who were not declared a party to the case, claimed to be the legal heirs of the deceased defendant and the suithouse owners, who also filed an objection petition. Was finally dismissed, the petitioners filed a review under O XXII, R 4 (1), in the case of the death of the defendant, the CPC on the petition filed by him, leading to legal representation. The defendants who have been killed will be made a party and will proceed under sub-rule (3) of AXXI, CPC 4R CPC When the R 4 sub-rule (1) shall not apply under any given or not given information. XXII, the CPC court may proceed with this case and, in spite of the death of such defendant, any judgment or decision is pronounced in such case, shall have the same power and effect as the death of the defendant. Had already been heard, who were not enforced as a party in this case, their case was referred to as A.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
