Section 497 (2) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860); join provisions 2/3/324 / at34 and attempt to murder B, was shot by a bullet, including three for the applicant. The accused was indicted in which the incident took place inside the wall at midnight without any specific role of the applicant. During the investigation, the property of the complainant's owner, who was killed and the prosecution witness was sleeping, did not find any bullet marks on the walls of the wanderer within the boundaries of the attackers, nor did the investigating officer prepare a site plan. At the time of the alleged vacancy was not recovered nor the site plan showed any. According to the medical evidence, the gunshot wound was in the back of the victim, which was inconsistent with the prosecutor's story due to the fact that he was alerted and saw the suspect at the scene of the incident while the applicant's case and Was also Investigation should be done during the trial as a result of the investigation that he or she has hurt the late or shared a common intention with other accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
