Sections 279, 320, 337A (1), 337F (ii), 337 G&33 7L (iii) criminal code of conduct for irritation or negligence (V9 1898), sections 227, 237, 342 and 537 were only under 520 accused of altering testimonial evidence or increasing the charge, the PPC charged with the murder of three male victims and was not charged with the fourth murder of the woman, but the accused Was convicted on four counts of murder, including murder of a female victim. Such allegations were not brought to the notice of the accused at the adjournment stage, which seriously violated Section 227 of the accused, CRPC provided that the trial court proceeded against the accused at the relevant time. The charge had to be adjusted or increased. The decision is subject to the condition that such changes or additions will be well read and explained to the accused over time. The trial court did not do so in the present case and amended the allegation after the verdict. That had a direct bias. Indicating that the accused had no opportunity of self-defense, which was his correct trial court, after recording the evidence, he passed a verdict against the accused and sentenced him to death for the three accused, In the last part of the verdict without indictment against the accused, the trial court passed the sentence against the accused, which was not delivered to them before recording their statement under Section 342, CRPC, Defective Section537, CRPC Sections 227 and 237, was not curable under CRPC. Trial Court A charge against a person charged with a crime
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
